![]() ![]() (1) correspond to those unmeasured nodes of the graph You need the image itself to contain the areas that: ![]() I am asking, since this is an ongoing problem and tried different configurations, what does one have to do to get all (if not, most) squares in the equilizer profiled? NV_Fan wrote:In addition, many other squares don't get selected or detected at all. I am at my wits-end! I am trying to build the perfect profile for my camera and in a controlled environment which should lead me to getting good profiling, but it always fails and never works.Īm I doing something wrong? Please can someone probably explain why could this be happening? I would really appreciate it guys! This was the second time I have taken a lot of time trying to set this up and build the profiles but every time I take it to Neat Video to manually fine-tune them it NEVER picks up all the frequencies, many of the squares in the calibration target just read the same measured data in Neat Video whilst some others just never get recognized. The end result has the exposure looking consistent throughout ISO 160 to ISO 12800, with the exception that it was getting grainier. Of course every time a change was made (in therms of ISO setting and exposure) the white balance was corrected. I am throwing 500W of light in the scene so I can get it very well and evenly exposed, shooting at f1.4 so I can get it slightly out of focus (giving the coloured squares a smooth look and theoretically would read them better) and using an ND filter to expose each shot correctly (exposing for highlights then expose 1-stop). I'm going to try and keep this concise but I have downloaded and carefully printed the calibration targets onto a nice white thick paper and proceeded many times with my camera capturing a few seconds of footage at each ISO setting. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |